Fact-checking prompts for Grok | Maitz
Templates, not documented product output.

I want to check a claim before sharing it.
Exact claim: [paste one sentence]
Link to the post, if available: [link]
Post date, if known: [date]
Break the sentence into smaller claims that can be checked separately.
For each claim, say what evidence is needed to verify it.
Do not decide whether it is true yet. Distinguish the publication date, event date, and actual availability.

---

Find sources for each of the claims you identified.
Prefer a primary source that fits the question: a company announcement, product documentation, or an official statement from the relevant organization.
For each claim, return the source name, a direct link, the source date, and the section that supports or contradicts it.
Separate information you found from your own conclusions.
If you did not open a source or there is no direct source, say so explicitly. Do not invent a link or quotation.

---

Based on the sources we opened, summarize each claim separately:
Claim | Verified / Contradicted / Missing context / Unverified | What in the source supports the decision | Link.
Do not mark a claim as "Verified" if the source merely mentions the topic.
Finish with a list of gaps that still need checking, without filling them with guesses.